top of page

Personally Speaking: ‘Green belt ware­house plan isn’t my cup of tea’

  • 17 hours ago
  • 3 min read
My Personally Speaking column in The Sentinel (2 July 2026)

One of the best things about being our MP is the chance to sit down with a cuppa and a slice of cake and hear from local people about what’s on their minds.


That’s exactly what I did last Fri­day, when I held my latest cof­fee morn­ing at Aud­ley Cricket Club.


Thank you to every­one who joined me and thank you to every­one who helped make it hap­pen – includ­ing those who baked a cake! Much bet­ter bakers than me…


As you might expect, one of the issues that came up time and again was site alloc­a­tion AB2 in New­castle Bor­ough Coun­cil’s Local Plan.


It’s why, as tem­per­at­ures soared a week last Wed­nes­day, I stood up in Par­lia­ment to present a peti­tion in the House of Com­mons call­ing on the bor­ough coun­cil to remove AB2 from its Local Plan.


After receiv­ing the sup­port of more than 800 people from Aud­ley and the sur­round­ing area – our peti­tion shows that the views of local people are very clear


– we don’t need bluster and excuses, we need the bor­ough coun­cil to listen.


AB2 is ear­marked as a Stra­tegic Employ­ment Site, cov­er­ing around 80 hec­tares of green belt land near Junc­tion 16 of the M6, for large-scale ware­hous­ing and logist­ics units.


It rightly leaves res­id­ents wor­ried about traffic, the land­scape, noise and light pol­lu­tion.


That’s why res­id­ents – and I – have pushed back so strongly. We remain con­cerned about the inef­fect­ive and infre­quent engage­ment from the coun­cil on this import­ant point.


This is land that gives Aud­ley its char­ac­ter – open coun­tryside that acts as a buf­fer between the vil­lages and the M6 and A500 around them.


Once it’s built on, there’s no get­ting it back. Of course we need to build homes but we need to build in the right place and build com­munit­ies not ware­houses.


I have lost count of the num­ber of con­ver­sa­tions I have had with res­id­ents about this – on the door­step, over a cuppa, on email and walk­ing our streets.


The con­cerns voiced to me by res­id­ents are reas­on­able and con­sist­ent - increased HGV traffic through vil­lages with single­car­riage­way roads and no pave­ments, more noise and light pol­lu­tion in a part of the bor­ough that people chose to live pre­cisely because it was quiet and green and the loss of hab­itat for wild­life that has called this land home for gen­er­a­tions.


This isn’t the first step I’ve taken on AB2. I’ve sub­mit­ted my thoughts – and those of res­id­ents – throughout the Local Plan pro­cess, reflect­ing the con­cerns that res­id­ents have raised with me as MP.


But that con­sulta­tion pro­cess only has real value if it genu­inely helps to shape decisions, and there is very little evid­ence of that here.


I’ve also been rais­ing the safety of the


lay­out of the A500 Aud­ley slip road with National High­ways and Stafford­shire County Coun­cil, given the exist­ing con­cerns about traffic in this part of the world already.


Adding a major new logist­ics site into that mix, without those issues being resolved first, doesn’t add up and is a cause of major con­cern.


That is why I took this peti­tion to the House of Com­mons. Put­ting res­id­ents’ con­cerns dir­ectly on the record in Par­lia­ment, and send­ing a clear sig­nal that the com­munity must be heard.


I will keep using every tool avail­able to me as our MP to make sure res­id­ents’ con­cerns are heard – in Par­lia­ment, with those behind the pro­pos­als, and dir­ectly with the coun­cil.


Res­id­ents have been rais­ing AB2 since 2021, and they deserve a coun­cil that engages with them prop­erly and openly, as it makes decisions on the future of the site mov­ing for­ward.


I will not stop push­ing until the coun­cil listens, prop­erly, to the people who live, learn and work across Aud­ley and the sur­round­ing area.

bottom of page